Friday, July 11, 2008

It's been weeks since Hillary Clinton left the Presidential race. She has now repeatedly, and enthusiastically, endorsed Barack Obama. And yet, there are still sites out there, like this one, whose pseudonymous hosts are "supporting" her almost entirely by attacking the candidate who she has endorsed. What are we to make of this?

Well, there are all sorts of reasons for posting pseudonymously, and one shouldn't necessarily impute any particular motive. But people sometimes do it to conceal their true motives. Alexander Hamilton, for instance, published his essays in support of the proposed U.S. Constitution as "Publius" largely because he'd already made it plain to enough folks that in reality, he was opposed to it. (He wanted a strong executive.)

Which leaves me, as one pseud, asking of another: when "pro-Hillary" blogs echo Republican talking points and act as collection points for attack ads against Democratic nominees, what's really going on? An old Roman had a way of answering that question --- by posing another: cui bono? Who does it help?


Blogger Indra maulana ridwan said...

really interesting reading, when i am read very pleased and want to continue to read it. Good luck with this article. I also have articles that may be beneficial, as this article: obat kusta obat puru-puru cara mengobati ayan pada anak The article discusses health treatment. The next article also discusses the same thing cara mengobati gagal ginjal selain cuci darah cara memulihkan patah tulang The article discusses health treatment. The next article also discusses the same thing obat tradisional mata minus dan mata plus cara mengobati sakit sendi obat luka di kaki akibat diabetes May I share articles, it may be useful to other people.

3:27 AM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home