So, you might almost not notice that in several more minor ways, another Republican dogma has also been taking it on the chin --- the effectiveness of privatized government services.
Begin with airport security --- which, as the Republicans were forced to admit in the wake of Sept. 11th, is a law enforcement function, and as such, something that even moderate libertarians will admit into the proper sphere of government. (Having brought it into government, they seem to be running it so far not much better than the failed private sector efforts --- but theirs is the party that claims to bring the virtues of business to government).
Next, consider the privatization of forest fire fighting, where the scandal isn't so much the recent fire apparently set by a privatized fire fighter trying to drum up business, as the conditions of the industry generally:
- Privatizing firefighting was supposed to cut costs. But it
has done nothing of the sort. Last summer, which was an "average" fire
season, was the most costly on record. Nearly $700 million was spent
fighting fires --- $230 million more than budgeted. The poster child for
that fire season was a small blaze in Oregon called the Craggie
Fire. Although burning in wilderness and no threat to people or homes,
fire crews and helicopters were thrown into battle. The final bill for
the 2,700-acre fire: $2.6 million, an average of $9,455 per
acre. During the 2001 fire season it cost an average of $1,340 per
acre to fight fires on the national forests --- 270 percent more than it
did in 2000.
Even more troubling is that throwing those sorts of resources at big fires accomplishes little except the creation of a big bill. ... [If] a blaze exceeds a few hundred acres and finds the wind at its back, firefighters can only try to ... chivy the fire away from particular areas. And even that's problematic; once a big fire gets rolling, moving at 2 or 3 miles per hour across a front that's 10 or 12 miles wide, the preferred strategy is to get the hell out of the way and hope it rains.
Consider as well recent events in Washington DC, where a private contractor running a group home for the city's Child and Family Services agency seems remarkably tolerant of sexual abuse of the kids. (Alert readers will recall that the government of Florida couldn't run such a program well itself. But then again, that's a Republican administration --- in fact, a Bush administration --- and they do claim to bring the virtues of business to government).
There are several things these cases have in common besides just
malfeasance by contractors. One could note, for instance, that in
each case, the deal was structured so that the sole customer was
government. In that kind of distorted market, the contractors
actually have an incentive to learn whatever quirks of their sole
customer will let them chisel out the most money with the least
effort; when the customer in question is as pliant to
kickbacks campaign contributions as American
governments tend to be, the result is not pretty.
None of which is much of a surprise to folks in Massachusetts who lived through the Weld administration's privatization initiatives, recounted here. This study obviously takes a point of view, but the facts are straight as far as I can tell. Briefly, there was a flood of early privatization initiatives, which pretty nearly dried up when the legislature forced Weld to account for his claimed savings more honestly. And there were some interesting side trips along the way, ranging from early controversy over conditions at privatized mental hospitals, to several cases in which government workers' labor unions submitted low bids, to have them thrown out on technicalities, in favor of contractors with apparent ties to the governor.
One late case of that is particularly amusing --- the bid was thrown out because the union was offering to privatize more than the government had put up for bid; they wanted to privatize all routes run out of an entire garage, and not just the particular routes most convenient to Weld's contractor cronies. Which sort of thing isn't necessarily unusual in the larger world of business, as you can see by examining the business career of George W. Bush.
In fact, privatization of this sort, moving government services out of the realm of government proper (where government regulations like, say, FOIA, apply) can be seen, in the larger view, as one front in the greater war which Dubya's administration has been fighting with vigor for as long as he has been in office: the War on Accountability.